The fear of legal entanglements to chill the idea of a less regressive tax requires more staff work. They need to show where in case law or legislative intent that a lawsuit would prevail.
If the fire flow square root issue is central to the law, where is it in the history of the legislation?
Given the tremendous variation in how these things are funded among the current 13 or so RFAs, why is this factor so important?
Many RFAs use "hazard factors" to set the fee. This Oly-Tum proposal does not. A building full of nitro would probably get a higher insurance policy cost vs. a building full of bricks, right? But this proposal whistles past that difference in formulas being used.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
