This is a great analysis, and while I do not agree with everything written here, I appreciate the sentiment for understanding and openness.
One thing I would like to bring up is the argument that dense developments without parking will not work until proper transit is supported is kind of like a chicken and the egg conundrum. A transit network will never be efficient if development is not built dense, no matter how big the city is. (Like Dallas, huge city but horrible transit because of parking requirements preventing dense development). However, dense development becomes blocked because of this argument, continuing to make transit inefficient. Dense development creates great transit networks, but transit will always be inefficient if we do not build dense first.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
