I don't often agree with the Thurston County Republicans. I am an elected Democratic precinct committee officer. But they hit the nail right on the head with this.
I oppose the RFA for different reasons. The Fire Benefit Charge is highly regressive -- it charges the smallest homes at a higher rate than the charges the largest homes.
It uses a "square root of the square feet" formula, that makes small locally-owned apartments buildings (five units) pay 5 times as much per unit as a large corporate-owned apartment complex of 200 units. That's just a subsidy to big corporations.
There are ZERO new firefighters or paramedics identified in the Seven-Year Strategic Plan for the RFA, but our population is growing at 2% per year. So our quality of service will decline at about 2% per year.
The planned salary scale for the RFA is off the charts. The top six brass would each cost us a quarter-million dollars per year (including benefits).
Look at the facts at www.saveourfd.org
Big new fees. No new service. Vote NO. Keep your fire service local.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.