The article has a key fact wrong:
"The commission also voted on the proposed change of providing vehicle parking spaces of one or two spaces for single-family residences, duplexes, and townhouses, at the property owner's discretion, for properties within one-quarter mile of the transit route on a city-designated arterial or collector street."
No, the commission threw out all the language that would limit the change to properties in proximity to transit.
The Commission voted for applying the zero policy THROUGHOUT the city and for ALL types of residential buildings.
And by the way, zero minimum parking = zero accessible parking and zero electric vehicle charging spaces. This "ready, shoot, aim" approach to changing laws needs to stop. Again, I urge the Planning Commission to take a step back and listen to the community before acting so hastily.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
