I agree with the author that our port is obsolete.
What I don’t agree with is the author’s ideas for redevelopment, in an area that will likely be under water, if only by a foot or two, within the next 30-50 years. In my personal opinion, it might be better to use for recreation, by increasing space for recreational boaters, parks and entertainment venues that when the time came wouldn’t have too much impact. Building apartments, boutiques, restaurants, sounds lovely until those living and working by the sound experience flooding for three years in a row, and then are leave abandoned to the sea.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
