I'm a little confused. I live in Lacey and the last time I asked a city official at one of our community townhalls if Lacey was short on water quantity (considering the increase in resident population) , he said "no". Rather, he implied the delivery infrastructure was inadequate and that's why Lacey restricts home addresses to watering on certain days of the week, i.e., if everyone watered at once the delivery system wouldn't have the capacity to cope. So, does this drilling project reported in the story seek more underground water quantity or rather a suitable site to increase the delivery infrastructure?
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
