What a strange way to run a city. The council was supposed to vote on this, which would have provided "transparency", which would be good -- we'd know where individual members stand on the issue. The council didn't vote, but somehow the issue was sent to staff for work. Is that even compliant with the council's own rules of procedure?
Sounds like this violates the purpose of the Open Public Meetings Act.
How can we, the voters and taxpayers, know what is going on, so we can make informed voting decisions?
Bob Jacobs
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
