I really don't get the local obsession with converting Capitol Lake to a mudflat. After reading the EIS I discovered that the document was written with rose colored glasses with glossy color pictures of the Managed Lake and the Modified Lake alternatives but strangely there were no pictures of the estuary alternative. They could easily have zipped out to Mud Bay and taken some glossy pictures of the estuary at low tide to let folks know what they were signing up for....but didn't apparently want anyone to know what it would really look (and smell) like. What a bad idea!
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
