This story does not at all accurately reflect what 'the Commissioners did' at that meeting, concerning the letter to DES. I was at that meeting, and Commissioner Zita expressed a strong and distinct dissatisfaction with this letter, and asked that it be taken back to be redone. She voted against the letter as is, and gave many specific examples of why beforehand.
This article gives the impression that the Commissioners were in sync about this, until way at the end, one short bit referred to Comm. Zita's only opposition being in the form of 'tone and grammar'.
That's either very poor reporting, or possibly a disingenuous rendering of the actual events.
I have just started reading JOLT, but I hope this is an aberration and not a habit.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
