I love how Pat would like to set a positive tone but starts off with the title of the article stating "more reasonable responses." This is not a positive tone and itself that it indicates that Pat and possibly others think that previous police response is not reasonable there for setting a negative tone. There are many of us, and perhaps we are the silent majority that feel that previous police responses were reasonable and potentially not enough to protect citizens. Of course this is not a popular view within the Pacific Northwest and if we happened to voice it and public or where others are that don't agree we would be chastised and treated poorly as opposed to engaging in a debate which is what we would do with the opposing viewpoint. Just wanted to point out bot everyone agrees with you except those you hear.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
