Thank you Pat Cole for the well reasoned and nicely put analysis of the proposed RFA. Commenter JW noted that with increased population future costs will increase anyway. That may be, but as Cole noted there are immediately increases of $8.8 million in added direct costs PLUS making up the losses to the parks department PLUS the "fee" to each and every property owner designed to make the rate of "fee" higher for small properties and lower for large property owners. This RFA is a very bad deal and we should follow the lead of Lacey with our answer: No thanks.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
