Olympia's Community Livability and Public Safety Committee approved the Cultural Access Advisory Board's recommendation to increase grant funding for local cultural organizations and schools.
The recommendation will move forward to the city council for consideration.
At a committee meeting on Tuesday, July 23, Cultural Access Program Manager Marygrace Goddu shared the board's recommendations. She said the updates aim to broaden access to grants, strengthen the impact of the program, and make thoughtful use of a $3.5 million reserve that has accumulated since the tax-funded program launched.
The Inspire Olympia program is funded by a 0.1% local sales tax that voters approved in April 2022. The program aims to support arts, science and heritage programming. Tax collection began 18 months before the first round of grants was awarded. In addition, the program underspent during its first year, particularly on public school programs, such as cultural field trip transportation.
As a result, the program entered its second year with approximately $3.5 million in unspent funds.
The board is proposing a four-year financial plan that would gradually draw down most of that reserve, while maintaining a responsible financial buffer by increasing annual grant awards and investments in schools and organizational development.
"Our goal is to put more of this money to work without compromising the financial stability or the long-term planning that we are trying to do with this fund," Goddu said.
The board's proposal outlined how Inspire Olympia can gradually use the reserve through 2029, while keeping $500,000 to $600,000 in reserve by the end of that period. That amount represents about 20% of the city's grant commitments — a threshold recommended by the city's finance department.
The plan assumes annual Cultural Access tax revenues will remain at $3.1 million per year, although actual revenues may increase. To stay within budget, the program would cap administrative costs at 10% of revenue each year and direct the rest toward grant funding.
The board recommends raising the maximum grant amounts available to applicants in both funding categories:
Goddu noted half of the current impact grantees fall in the mid-to-upper size range of this category and would benefit from expanded funding access.
"Interestingly, the impact group has, when you look at them in their program sizes, there's a significant cluster of about 30 organizations, and that's about half of them, that are in the range of $100,000 to $200,000, and that's including their volunteer, the value of their volunteer (contributions)," Goddu said.
"The board also recommends adding a requirement for comprehensive fund organizations to provide youth programming. This is a change that would impact only one current organization, which, on paper, doesn't do youth programming but, they do, so it is not a huge adjustment for them to step up their formal program in that area."
If approved by the city council, the proposed changes would apply to:
Updated program guidelines will be published this November, giving applicants time to prepare before submitting proposals in early 2026.
3 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
terry
From reading this article is it possible to discern what the money is being spent on? Just asking.
Friday, July 25, 2025 Report this
mhjwilson
From what I have seen there are homeless women on the streets but we have money to spend on this. In addition it is well known that elections held during off months have a lower turn out and often it is only the supporters who vote for these things. This is not a priority issue.
Saturday, July 26, 2025 Report this
HappyOlympian
I certainly voted against this, some silly uses of funds here. Boooooooo
Saturday, July 26, 2025 Report this