The Olympia School District Board of Directors is looking at the possibility of boundary realignment to provide elementary students with more efficient travel routes and better utilization rates at the middle school level.
The district partnered with BERK Consulting for the Olympia School District Attendance Area Boundary Study, which identifies potential revisions to current boundaries.
Two scenarios have been recommended: assigning elementary students to schools closer to their homes to improve travel efficiency; and, transferring middle school territory and students to balance utilization rates, which measures how effectively a school’s facility accommodates students.
BERK Associate Principal Kevin Gifford said the realignment would promote compact attendance areas and efficient travel, balance student enrollment to make efficient use of facilities, and avoid creating areas that would isolate Black, Indigenous and People of Color, low-income and special needs students, as well as students whose primary language is not English.
Travel times
The first scenario considered elementary attendance area boundaries based on a drive time analysis, which prioritizes efficient student travel.
“The boundaries would assign elementary students to the school closest to their home and maintain existing progression relationships between elementary, middle, and high schools,” the study states.
Significant changes to current attendance areas are expected if the first scenario is realized.
Attendance areas on the west side — L.P. Brown, Hansen and McLane elementary schools — would shrink, and Garfield Elementary School's attendance area would expand.
On the east side, attendance areas for Boston Harbor and Lincoln elementary schools would shrink. Attendance areas for Roosevelt and Madison elementary schools would expand northward, while some of the southern territory would be transferred to neighboring schools.
The study states only minor shifts in attendance areas are expected from Pioneer, McKenny and Centennial elementary schools.
The second scenario focuses on balancing utilization rates across four middle schools for a more efficient enrollment distribution.
Two middle schools in the district, Washington and Marshall, have utilization rates above 85 percent, and another two, Jefferson and Reeves, have utilization rates below 70 percent.
Territory and students from Washington and Marshall middle schools would be transferred to Reeves and Jefferson middle schools.
The second scenario would transfer Lincoln Elementary School from Washington Middle School to Jefferson Middle School to realign elementary and middle school boundaries, aiming to balance utilization in middle schools.
“Scenario 2 would also realign elementary boundaries to ensure elementary school attendance areas remain 'nested' within middle school attendance areas and to maintain balanced elementary enrollment to the extent possible,” the study states.
The following are projected shifts in middle school attendance based on the study:
The analysis also concludes that realigning attendance area boundaries would be significantly beneficial to the district for purposes of rebalancing student enrollment between schools.
“Due to your declining overall enrollment, unfortunately, doing an overall boundary realignment is unlikely to have significant benefit for school utilization or operational and staffing efficiency,” Gifford said.
Other potential strategies recommended in the study include a review of district policies regarding in-district transfer, grade reconfiguration and school consolidation.
The school district superintendent is expected to present an official recommendation to the school board after the approval of the budget in June.
3 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
UnretiredTeacher
Maybe its about time we consolidate the numerous districts and all the administrative costs in Thurston County. Each district has its own Superintendent, and its own set of department chiefs. Lots of duplication of effort and salaries! Much larger counties than ours are far more streamlined and more cost efficient.
Monday, June 8 Report this
mhjwilson
I agree with the Unretired Teacher, but would go a bit further.
Let the schools compete for the teachers and students and the money should follow the students..
Monday, June 8 Report this
Anon1599
We need to be re-thinking not just the Olympia School District, but North Thurston and Tumwater as well.
Why do kids that live a half mile from Olympia High School go to Black Hills? Why do kids that live closer to Timberline or North Thurston go to Olympia?
We have overcrowded elementary schools in Tumwater, and underutilized elementary schools in Olympia.
And to be frank, we need to close a high school in Tumwater, and close an elementary or two in Olympia.
Want a solution? Combined NTPS, OSD, and TSD. Close Black Hills. Those kids live closer to Olympia HS (on Tumwater Hill and the Hoadley/North Street area) anyways. Some of the Black Lake-area kids could go to Capital, and then the rest would go to Tumwater. Better utilize the OSD elementary schools by shifting the borders south. A lot of the kids who go to an overcrowded Tumwater Hill, Michael T. Simmons and Black Lake Elementary schools could be shifted to McLane, Pioneer, Centennial and Lincoln.
This would pull Tumwater up to 3A, so that they could compete against North Thurston, River Ridge, Timberline, Capital and Shelton, saving lots of time and money on trips. You could probably even run a 3A league of just Thurston and Mason County.
Now, you've eliminated tens of millions of dollars of unnecessary administration, provided more options to all students, and maybe even saved a couple elementaries, and you could even open a new one. Tumwater also can utilize BHHS as the new TMS, and TMS can become a desperately needed new elementary school for Tumwater.
Not a single teacher or community liaison would need to be cut, and all 3 school districts would have significant financial problems disappear.
But, as we know, this would hurt the superintendents and budget directors. And superintendents and budget directors tell school boards what to do, not the other way around.
Tuesday, June 9 Report this