Deanima, so my guess was right. Meanwhile, you aren't even close on me (weakness of liberal biases). The problem with your position is these people you put on a pedestal have been sounding some kind of alarm since the 70's. None of it came true. In fact, the Little Ice Age ended in the mid-1800s and CO2 ppm was below 150, at which point plant life begins to die. The focus now on C02 is especially pernicious because it is essential to the formation of life on this planet. The anti-CO2 crusade seems more like population control. Since you have a degree in reviewing made-up models, again, have you looked at C02 absorption spectrums? How much more temperature rise can actually be attributed to increasing ppms of CO2 (its a logarithmic relationship, btw)? Is it even a good thing to reduce CO2 considering it would lead to mass death? Is it not true that in prior epochs CO2 levels were substantially higher and the planet was filled with life? I genuinely wonder how many boomers can truly come to grips with the depths of their own self-absorbed nihilism. It is one of the tragedies of Modernity. One day your age cohort will no longer be on this planet, and the rest of us will begin the process of cleaning up the self-absorbed mess you created.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
